Norwegian leverages its oil know-how – stratfor worldview

Norwegian leverages its oil know-how - stratfor worldview facilities above water for

Technological challenges aren’t anything new for Norwegian, nor is overcoming them. When foreign companies first found Norwegian to understand more about for hydrocarbons within the 1960s and 1970s, the nation’s domestic understanding and abilities in the region were practically nonexistent. Oslo soon setup Statoil, requiring operators to employ the absolute minimum quantity of local companies to be able to cultivate a technically proficient domestic industry. Norwegian also rapidly adapted its shipbuilding and maritime technology, acquired over centuries of expertise, and merchant shipping sector for everyone a burgeoning offshore oil and gas sector.

Norwegian has become the place to find a large number of innovative oil and gas firms that rank one of the world’s leaders in offshore technology, most generally in offshore environments much like Norwegian. Including from behemoth Statoil to service companies for example Aker Solutions. Obviously, not every one of the groundbreaking technology being deployed in Norwegian is produced by Norwegian companies. But Statoil and Norwegian come with an ongoing good reputation for working assiduously to setup joint industry projects to be able to solve a few of the challenges to, and develop a few of the necessary technology for, hydrocarbons production in Norwegian.

Maintaining North Ocean Production

Such as the Netherlands and also the Uk, Norwegian does everything it may to sustain production levels within the North Ocean. But new breakthroughs in the area have become more and more costly to create, usually due to a mixture of factors: The invention is comparatively small, geologically challenging (like a high-temperature, high-pressure area) or isolated from existing infrastructure. Meanwhile, old fields have become harder to handle. Many will be in production for a long time and therefore are losing reservoir pressure. What this means is gas injection wells are necessary to maintain pressure and production rates.

Statoil and it is partners aspire to overcome a number of these issues by ongoing to transition from traditional processing facilities onshore or over water. In many typical offshore oil and gas production schemes, there’s limited infrastructure around the seabed, usually only a couple of wells with underwater pipelines that send oil and gas to facilities above water for processing. These above-water facilities control most operations involved with managing an oil field, such gas injection, water separation, gas and oil separation and a number of other processes. But because production zones venture farther offshore, depths increase and also the surface atmosphere becomes harsher, making the standard operations setup more costly.

Norwegian has gradually but surely led the way for that integration of a few of these processing facilities into subsea infrastructure. In 2007, the earth’s first subsea water separation, boosting and injection system was installed at Statoil’s Tordis field, growing the maturing field’s recovery rate from 49 to 55 percent. In ’09, a subsea seawater injection system was installed in the Tyrihans field, growing the recovery rate by 10 %. Within the first quarter of 2015, Statoil will launch the earth’s first subsea gas compression system — a method how big a football field — in the Asgard oil field. The machine is anticipated to improve overall recovery by 280 million barrels by injecting gas in to the reservoir. By 2020, Statoil wishes to have every process done around the seabed, a plan it terms a "Subsea Factory."

Many obstacles to that particular high goal remain. Besides, the introduction of subsea technologies can enhance the financial aspects of most of the North Sea’s marginal and mature fields. Such technologies can increase recovery more proficiently, since injection facilities would be best suitable for be deployed nearer to production wells. Additionally they eliminate the requirement for facilities above water or onshore, potentially reducing capital expenses. They’re unmanned too, reducing operational expenses. And possibly most considerably, scalping strategies could be adapted to subsea environments past the North Ocean. For while Statoil’s goals for subsea technological development are now being created for immediate use within its northern border Ocean, Statoil also envisions them as potential methods to problems farther north.

Operations within the Arctic and Farther Afield

Production within the Norwegian and Barents seas and also the broader Arctic carries more challenges than operating within the North Ocean. The whole region is isolated from existing infrastructure, meaning everything should be constructed from scratch. Consequently, breakthroughs will probably be they canrrrt make economic sense — a minimum of initially — because existing infrastructure cannot be employed to keep costs down. The location can also be much cooler, so icing, hydrate formation and the chance of iceberg strikes should also be addressed. Furthermore, operations in a lot of the Arctic involve drilling wells through subsea permafrost, requiring care to make sure that the subsea permafrost doesn’t melt in the heat generated by drilling.

Operations during these regions may also pose significant logistical difficulties. With virtually no daylight throughout the winter several weeks and the opportunity of ocean ice, the drilling season is going to be limited. The atmosphere within the Arctic can also be fragile, creating other obstacles. Even safety and health protocols for workers is going to be challenging due to the harsh climactic conditions and extreme isolation. Thus, operations here will likely be megaprojects rich in capital expenses and development occasions encountering years otherwise ten years, adding financial risks because of the probability of cost overruns along with other financial burdens.

Inside a bid to beat a few of these hurdles, Aker Solutions is developing an Arctic drillship with unique icebreaking abilities that will enable results in areas with ice drift. Normal icebreakers break ice by lifting their mass to the ice. For any drillship, this is often problematic because damaged ice can impact the drilling riser. Aker Solutions gets for this condition in part by redesigning the shell to redirect damaged ice towards the ship’s sides.

Statoil’s offshore acumen has additionally managed to get a vital explorer and producer not even close to northern waters. It’s operated in the majority of the world’s busiest offshore oil and gas regions, everywhere from Nigeria, Angola, the Gulf and Canada to, more lately, Tanzania, where Statoil helps create the African country to export gas in in the future. It’s also provided technical expertise and offered a supplier role in other locations, for example Australia as well as in the South China Ocean, where it’s installed subsea components for China National Offshore Oil Corp. However the most geopolitically important oil relationship abroad for Norwegian is going to be with Russia.

Russian Complications

Norway’s subsea technical proficiency means it most likely will be the main thing on solving Arctic or near-Arctic offshore challenges, making Statoil along with other Norwegian companies logical partners for Russia. However this cooperation is complicated by Oslo’s unique relationship with Moscow. Russia and Norwegian share a maritime and land border within the Arctic. The maritime border was disputed for many years prior to the countries signed a agreement demarcating it this year. Russia decided to the demarcation agreement in return for technology which help developing its sources.

Norwegian leverages its oil know-how - stratfor worldview strikes should also beResourse:

How Stratfor Covers the World


alabaster: What kind of audience do you think this sort of advertising appeals to? As a paying subscriber, this material is actually embarrassing.

SERGE: +totallynotraging a bit of stretch, what exactly do you have to compare against anyway? Of course they want this to appeal to fairly broad audience but also one that wants to understand more "not just headlines". I don't believe this is embarrassing. 40 second clip cannot contain all the world events or a big portion of any events. They specifically chose to focus on a European conflict revolved around Ukraine because it can be easily associated with. Those that can associate can connect and learn more.

Jeff Mitchell: +STRATFORvideo I like that you keep it simple, but have Fred Burton talking as the main focus.

Enter a name here: This channel is just fantastic! \n\nIt really does get past the headlines and goes into the next level of world events. Stratfor discusses the tactical nature of events, the effects physical and human geography on events, and sometimes gets into even more nitty gritty stuff like what leaders are thinking and how they may act.\n\nIt's also really easy to follow along because nobody is lecturing. It's conversational (albeit a little more sophisticated) because they're literally having a conversation. It's nice because sometimes one host will ask the other to clarify on something and ask for further explanation. At other times one host will have an insight and discuss it with the other giving the viewer the same insight.\n\nIt's also, along with covering more and explaining more, somehow shorter than actually watching the news!\n\nAlso this channel is never biased; I had an international student from China who distrusted all American news and thought this channel would be propaganda biased against China, watch a Stratfor video on China. At the end of the video he said that not only had the conversation about the politics of his country been neutral, but it gave him insight that not even his Chinese news sources could give.

Former american patriot: Stratfor is war-mongering Neocon propaganda pretending to offer objective 'analysis'.  No thanks.

SERGE: Watching Stratfor videos prepares me for intellectual discussions regarding geopolitics. It has allowed me to grow in understanding that geography really does determine destiny or in part limits a nation states flexibility to respond and react politically, economically and military against its foes. World events can be more complicated than we previously imaged. Like a long game of chess each country is battling for supremacy. Events unfold, history is made and more becomes apparent after analysis and declassification. Individuals have there own agendas, same can be said for companies, organizations and even nations. Learn about there strategies and tactics here! A delicate balancing act, don't let the forces behind the scenes, the intelligentsia, be the sole deciders of our fate!

420Patriot1776: Hell yeah so fucking edgy! \n\nWelcome to le interwebz 

robox91: that 720p

John Barleycorn: Shared.

Dmitry Petrov: Accurate intelligence reports??? An article "I'm certifiably nuts. But Russia made me that way", that was based on Startfor hack leaks, shows that Stratfor is using fantasies to make their reports.